1 to 10 of 36 Results
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "State Legitimacy, Political Indicator (Fragile state Index) 2018", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/6PSXAQ, bonndata, V1
The State Legitimacy Indicator considers the representativeness and openness of government and its relationship with its citizenry. The Indicator looks at the population’s level of confidence in state institutions and processes, and assesses the effects where that confidence is a... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Participation, Environmental Democracy Index (Rank), 2014", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/BPBDNV, bonndata, V1
Environmental Democracy Index (EDI) consists of 75 legal indicators developed under 23 of the UNEP Bali Guidelines that are concerned with the development and implementation of legislation. In addition to the legal indicators, EDI includes 24 supplemental indicators that assess w... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Control of corruption, Worldwide Governance Indicator, 2016", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/FQCEC8, bonndata, V1
Control of corruption captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including both petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as "capture" of the state by elites and private interests. This table lists the individual variables from each... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Economic Decline and Poverty, Economic Indicator (Fragile state Index) 2018", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/NRJ3DQ, bonndata, V1
The Economic Decline Indicator considers factors related to economic decline within a country. For example, the Indicator looks at patterns of progressive economic decline of the society as a whole as measured by per capita income, Gross National Product, unemployment rates, infl... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Public Services, Political Indicator (Fragile state Index) 2018", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/TJ9TFU, bonndata, V1
The Public Services Indicator refers to the presence of basic state functions that serve the people. On the one hand, this may include the provision of essential services, such as health, education, water and sanitation, transport infrastructure, electricity and power, and intern... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Group Grievance, Cohesion Indicator (Fragile state Index) 2018", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/4ZQ00S, bonndata, V1
The Group Grievance Indicator focuses on divisions and schisms between different groups in society – particularly divisions based on social or political characteristics – and their role in access to services or resources, and inclusion in the political process. Group Grievance ma... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Average Bioeconomy Typology Indicators of World, 2010 -2015", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/EODTEG, bonndata, V1
The file consists of country wise database of whole world related to bioeconomy typology indicators collected from different online sources with following headings which are as follows: Importance of bio-based economic sectors in agriculture, Forestry, High-tech bioeconomy and bi... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Demographic Pressures, Social Indicator (Fragile state Index) 2018", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/KTTHJP, bonndata, V1
The Demographic Pressures Indicator considers pressures upon the state deriving from the population itself or the environment around it. For example, the Indicator measures population pressures related to food supply, access to safe water, and other life-sustaining resources, or... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Getting Electricity, Ranking of Economy, 2017", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/BKOLSZ, bonndata, V1
Economies are ranked on their ease of doing business, from 1–190. A high ease of doing business ranking means the regulatory environment is more conducive to the starting and operation of a local firm. The rankings are determined by sorting the aggregate distance to frontier scor... |
Amit Kumar Basukala, 2023, "Factionalised Elites, Cohesion Indicator (Fragile State Index) 2018", https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/9ZHZRE, bonndata, V1
The Factionalized Elites indicator considers the fragmentation of state institutions along ethnic, class, clan, racial or religious lines, as well as and brinksmanship and gridlock between ruling elites. It also factors the use of nationalistic political rhetoric by ruling elites... |
